Friday, February 12, 2010

Good examples vs bad examples

Good examples-


Tim Tebow has made a stand to express his Christian views about the sanctity of life. The Tebow Super Bowl ad run in the first quarter of the game was very subdued but had a profound hidden message. All life is precious to God. The story of Tebow's mom making the decision to keep him rather than abort him even though doctors recommended it, shows her convictions as well.


Before the Super Bowl, numerous pro-abortion groups attacked Tebow and CBS for running the ad during a sports event. The fact is that these groups would have attacked Tebow and CBS no matter when they ran the ad! The anti-Christian campaign growing in America is taking the form of attacks against celebrities who share their faith in public, persecution of Christians in public schools and now churches being burned the ground in Texas. Tebow must be congratulated for being the man of God he says he is and not doing what Jesus' brother James said, "Faith without works is dead." America needs more Christians like Tebow who will be bold enough to step out of their comfort zones and confess their faith beyond the walls of the church. America needs more good examples to follow.


Tim Tebow's Brilliant Fake Leads to Pro-Life Score

David Gibson

Columnist

Who'd have guessed that Focus on the Family would have so much in common with ManCrunch?
The latter is the gay dating service that had its Super Bowl spot rejected by CBS, while Focus on the Family is the flagship political lobby of the Christian right that has been generating buzz for weeks over its pro-life ad starring Heisman-winning quarterback Tim Tebow and his mother


Turns out both outfits won big, because both realized that having everyone talk about you is every bit as important as actually doing or saying something controversial.

ManCrunch surely knew that going in, as companies often submit ads they know will get rejected by the network but will become all the more famous because of that rejection. It was win-win all the way. If ManCrunch's ad was accepted (watch it here; Fanhouse's coverage of all Super Bowl ads here), it would have been a breakthrough in network TV, and watched by millions of viewers. If it was rejected -- as turned out to be the case -- it would go viral and be watched by millions of viewers, though via YouTube and other sites.

Cha-ching!

Focus on the Family apparently knew the same thing. For weeks before the big game, the controversy over CBS' decision to reverse its previous policy barring advocacy ads to air the ad against abortion had sent Pam Tebow's story ricocheting around the Internet: how, as a Baptist missionary in the Philippines in 1987, she contracted amoebic dysentery while pregnant and was given drugs so powerful they caused a detached placenta and led doctors to forecast a stillborn baby or a child with terrible birth defects. The doctors reportedly counseled her to have an abortion that could save her life, but Pam Tebow refused. The result was Tim Tebow, superstar college football QB and pro-life poster child.

Pro-choice groups fulminated and a few hot-headed liberals fumed (though most media supported the ad -- they love the First Amendment more than policy positions, and they must salivate over the $2.8 million for 30 seconds of Super Bowl airtime that Focus on the Family paid to CBS).

The pushback only generated more support for Tebow and Focus and their message, and had anti-abortion types crowing about how Pam Tebow would be discussing her difficult choice for life and urging Americans to fight abortion.
Then came the Super Bowl, and the ad, which ran in the first quarter, after spots for Bud Light and Snickers.

The ad fit right in. It opens simply, and the only black-and-white aspect of the spot was Pam Tebow's black outfit and the white background behind her. She speaks in an appealingly folksy voice, with pleasing guitar chords underneath:

PAM: I call him my miracle baby. He almost didn't make it into this world. I can remember so many times when I almost lost him. It was so hard. Well, he's all grown up now, and I still worry about his health. You know, with all our family's been through, you have to be tough.

Suddenly Tim plows in from stage left and tackles his mom. But she pops up, with a coy scold in her voice:

PAM: Timmy! I'm trying to tell our story here.

TIM: Sorry about that, Mom. You still worry about me, Mom?

PAM: Well, yeah. You're not nearly as tough as I am.

The ad closes with text telling viewers to visit the Focus on the Family Web site for the full Tebow story.


No mention of abortion, no recounting of the dramatic story. No need. Without any frame of reference, the spot could have been a pitch for osteoporosis medication or the need for universal health care or a reminder not to forget Mother's Day. But everyone knew what the ad was about and the ad didn't have to say anything directly -- which is the definition of the perfect advocacy ad. It was charming and disarming and went with the flow of the Super Bowl mania.

Contrast that with the woefully flat-footed counter ad that Planned Parenthood released before the Super Bowl in an effort to preempt what it figured would be an earnest anti-abortion message.

Oops. Tebow and Focus on the Family pump-faked, and tossed one over the head of the backpedaling defenders for a TD.

Jill Stanek, a pro-life nurse and blogger, pointed out that the ad was so light and touching that any viewer would be hard-pressed to be offended.

"So the last laugh is on pro-aborts," Stanek told LifeNews.com. "They gave the Tebow ad a forum to discuss abortion that pro-lifers could never have gotten from it alone."

She added that the ad is "quite tame, ambiguous really. In fact, one wouldn't know their topic was the pro-life issue -- that Pam made a 'choice' to bring Tim into the world -- were it not for all the hype."

Then again, that could be a problem in and of itself. Successful Super Bowl ads don't generally operate on the higher plane of subtlety and nuance. Moreover, if the pro-life movement is no more than a warm and fuzzy greeting card sentiment, what are they calling on people to do?

Still, there's no doubt this round went to pro-lifers, Focus on the Family, and perhaps most notably, Tim Tebow himself.

With questions swirling about whether Tebow, despite his stellar record at the University of Florida, will be drafted in the first-round by an NFL team, or even if he has the stuff to reproduce his college record in the pros, the Super Bowl advertisement looks as much like an agent's promotional video as it does a hot-button advocacy ad.





Bad examples-





Lindsay Lohan has had a very controversial career so far and she seems to always reinvent herself to remain that way! According to some articles on Lohan, she has dabbled in Judaism, Scientology ( the religion of John Travolta and Tom Cruz), Kabbala (ancient Jewish beliefs Madonna follows) and what seems to be a return to her Catholic roots.


Many Christians are now upset because of a recent pose Lohan did for a French magazine called Purple Fashion Magazine. The photo shows Lohan dressed in a white outfit with a crown of thorns on her head in a crucifix-type pose. The photo shows most of Lohan's chest exposed and looking like a Christ-figure. The responses about Lohan doing this pose have been very critical from Christians. One article (below) states Lohan may be returning to her Catholic roots which may explain her magazine pose and her recent wearing of a large cross.


It is possible that Lohan is looking for God but is going about it in the wrong way. Pray for her and her salvation. Christians should NOT be quick to curse the darkness BEFORE you understand where Lohan is in her walk with God. Remember, the apostle Paul was killing Christians before he gave his life to Christ!



http://www.politicsdaily.com/


Lindsay Lohan Makes Christians Cross

David Gibson columnist


Leave it to Lindsay. The "Mean Girls" star and a tabloid mainstay -- thanks to her various antics on the town, any town -- has explored Judaism, experimented with Scientology and Kabbalah, and has been in relationships both straight and gay.

Now she's striking a pose as Jesus Christ.

Lohan appears on the cover of the latest edition of Purple, a French fashion magazine, wearing a long white gown with a plunging neckline, a headdress designed like a crown of thorns, and with her arms outstretched like the crucified Christ.

The 23-year-old actress and model has often been seen, as above, wearing a large cross around her neck, so the cover shot could -- in a very generous reading -- be seen as a return to her roots since she was raised Roman Catholic. (Besides, her dad, Michael Lohan, did a stint as Jesus' father, Joseph, at a Times Square nativity scene a couple years ago.)

But some Catholics certainly aren't happy about Lohan channeling Jesus.

"Not only is the pose inappropriate, the timing is offensive" because the sacred season of Lent starts next week, said Bill Donohue, head of the Catholic League, the anti-Catholicism watchdog.

Donohue noted that the "spiritually homeless" Lohan recently tweeted that "i'm all about Karma...what goes around comes around." Added Donohue: "If she believes that, then it behooves her to apologize to Christians before it's too late." He also pulled a Brit Hume and suggested that, like Tiger Woods, Lohan would "would benefit by converting to Christianity." (Hindus welcomed her embrace of the principle of karma and said she might benefit from their religion.)

She also might benefit from some originality.

Madonna did the crucifixion shtick in 2006, and earlier that year pop star Kanye West drew predictable criticisms for appearing as a tortured Jesus on the cover of Rolling Stone.

And in 2008 Lohan herself posed for a New York magazine spread recreating the famous series of nudes shot of Marilyn Monroe just six weeks before the star's death on Aug. 5, 1962.

Now that's heresy.





American skier Lindsey Vonn




Lindsey is considered to be the best female American skier in history. It is a shame that she has chosen to prostitute herself in the recent Sports Illustrated swim suit edition. On the cover, Lindsey has a bikini on (sort of) with the top off and her top mostly exposed!In the photos inside, she is in very provocative poses and shows almost all of her breasts and pulls down her bikini bottom to reveal almost all of her pelvic area!This is NOT sports, it is pornography!


The shame of it all is that this young woman has a promising future in sports but she is obviously letting others talk her into doing inappropriate things to enhance her career. The fact that she is married and doing virtually pornographic poses is disturbing. What kind of man would want to see his wife pose like this?

Pray for Tebow that he will say strong and do what God tells him to do no matter what it costs. Pray for women like Lohan and Vonn who think they have to prostitute themselves to the world to get the love and acceptance that God freely gives.


Please see the article about church burnings below pass this on.



Randy Stemock, M.S.


founder- PRA ( Protecting Rights of Americans)





Three Persons of Interest in Texas Church Fires

Friday, February 12, 2010







TYLER, Texas — Investigators have released sketches of three persons of interest in a string of Texas church fires.

Images of the three men were provided Friday at a Tyler news conference by Special Agent Robert Champion with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.

Two church fires Monday northwest of Tyler have been ruled arson. The fires damaged Dover Baptist Church and Clear Spring Missionary Baptist Church.

Those fires brought to nine the number of deliberately set east Texas church fires since Jan. 1. ATF says another church fire in Temple, about 120 miles south of Dallas, also was arson.

No injuries have been reported.

The images released Friday show one man with short hair and a flame-like tattoo on his neck, another short-haired man with a cross on his left forearm, and a third man with longer hair.

Wednesday, February 3, 2010

The Super Bowl is an exciting even that millions of Americans look forward to. This year, a controversy has erupted about an ad by the University of Florida quarterback Tim Tebow who promoted a pro-life stance in America. Tebow has caught a lot of slack for his boldness to speak out about his Christian faith and his belief that all life is precious! The ad is being financially sponsored by the Christian organization Focus on the Family for $3 million dollars!



http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/01/17/tim-tebow-mothers-super-b_n_426673.html

Tim Tebow, Mother's Super Bowl Ad To 'Celebrate Life'
 
GAINESVILLE, Fla. — Tim Tebow is taking his star power to sport's biggest stage.




The former Florida quarterback and his mother will appear in a 30-second commercial during the Super Bowl next month. The Christian group Focus on the Family says the Tebows will share a personal story centering on the theme "Celebrate Family, Celebrate Life."

The group isn't releasing details, but the commercial is likely to be an anti-abortion message chronicling Pam Tebow's 1987 pregnancy. After getting sick during a mission trip to the Philippines, she ignored a recommendation by doctors to abort her fifth child and gave birth to Tim.



The 2007 Heisman Trophy winner ended his college career with several NCAA, Southeastern Conference and school records, and two national championships. Tebow also has been very involved in his family's Christian-based ministry.

Jim Daly, president and CEO of Focus on the Family, said the commercial comes at a time when "families need to be inspired."

"Tim and Pam share our respect for life and our passion for helping families thrive," Daly said. "Focus on the Family is about ... strengthening families by empowering them with the tools they need to live lives rooted in morals and values."

Thirty-second commercials during the Super Bowl are selling for between $2.5 million and $2.8 million. Daly said all the funds for the ad came from a handful of "very generous and committed friends," and that no money from the group's general fund was used.

"Now that the ad has been shot, we're excited to tell people it's coming because the Tebows' story is such an important one for our culture to hear," he said. "You won't want to miss it."




The problem is that Americans don't want to be reminded that more than 50 MILLION babies have been aborted in the U.S. since Roe vs Wade was made legal (kind of) by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1973. This is three times the population of Florida! The other problem is that Americans want to entertain themselves to the point where they distract themselves from dealing with most socially and morally sensitive issues. The average adult in the U.S. watches five hours of TV a day! Most young adults are so busy on their computers, IPods or cell phones, that they are too distracted to know anything about the issues facing this country! What does that say about the future of the U.S.?

http://www.focusonthefamily.com/socialissues/sanctity-of-life/abortion.aspx

Abortion

by Focus on the Family Issue Analysts

History in the United States

In the mid-to-late 1800's, all states passed laws making it illegal to perform or attempt to perform an abortion. These laws were supported by the medical community, which noted abortion's moral implications and danger to women.

During this time period, notable activists in the women's suffrage movement, such as Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton, spoke out against abortion in their efforts to protect women and children.

The term, "back-alley abortion," became slang for illegal abortions.

In 1959, efforts to liberalize state abortion laws were mounting, and model legislation to legalize abortion in limited cases was proposed at the state level. Abortion advocates often cited as many as ten thousand illegal abortion deaths each year as reason for legalization. However, statements from those on the forefront of this movement reveal that this number was, at best, unsubstantiated and, at worse, purposefully exaggerated. 1

Another argument for legalizing abortion was that it would enable licensed physicians — rather than unlicensed amateurs — to commit the act. However, in 1960, before abortion was legal, Mary Calderone, former president of Planned Parenthood, wrote that trained physicians performed "90% of illegal abortions." 2

In 1968, Colorado, California, North Carolina and Oregon reformed abortion laws to allow abortion in some cases.

Between 1969-1970, a dozen other states followed suit.

On January 22, 1973, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down every state abortion law through two rulings, Roe v Wade and Doe v Bolton.

Current Status

The number of annual reported abortions in the U.S. peaked in 1990 at 1.4 million abortions before dropping in subsequent years.

More than one million abortions are performed in the U.S. each year.

Based on current abortion rates, about one in three women will have an abortion by age 45. 3

Fourty-four percent of women who had abortions in the U.S. had at least one previous abortion. 4

Eighty-two percent of women who had abortions in the U.S. were unmarried. 5

Fifty percent of U.S. women having abortions are younger than 25 years old. 6

Recent public opinion polling indicates a majority of Americans support additional limits on abortion, including bans on late term abortions. They are not comfortable with the virtually unrestricted access it currently enjoys.

Most abortion laws are in effect at the state level. Since Roe and Doe, the US Supreme Court has granted states some latitude in regulating and restricting abortion. As a result, many states have passed measures mandating parental involvement in minor abortion decisions and uniform counseling with reflection periods. A federal ban on a specific type of late-term abortion, "partial birth abortion," was upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in April 2007.



Copyright © 2008 Focus on the Family. All rights reserved. International copyright secured.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



1Bernard Nathanson, Aborting America, Doubleday, 1979, p.193; Lucinda Cisler, "Birth Control" in Sisterhood is Powerful, edited by Robin Morgan, Vintage Books, 1970, p. 260.

2Source: M. Calderone, "Illegal abortion as a public health problem," American Journal of Public Health, July 1960, 50 (7): 949.

3Facts on Induced Abortion in the United Sates," Guttmacher Institute, July 2008, accessed online August 13, 2008 at http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/fb_induced_abortion.html

4Center for Disease Control and Prevention, "Abortion Surveillance 2004 Report,"November 23, 2007, accessed online August 13, 2008, 2008 at http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/PDF/ss/ss5609.pdf

5Center for Disease Control and Prevention, "Abortion Surveillance 2004 Report,"November 23, 2007, accessed online August 13, 2008 at http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/PDF/ss/ss5609.pdf

6Facts on Induced Abortion in the United Sates," Guttmacher Institute, July 2008, accessed online August 13, 2008 at http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/fb_induced_abortion.html

Fortunately amidst the outcries against theTebow ad, CBS had decided to air the ad. This is a great moment in the media because the liberal media did not fold under the pressure of the minority of complainers who wanted the ad pulled. We must remember, the First Amendment protects Tebow and all Americans under freedom of speech regardless of who likes it or doesn't like it!



http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2010/01/27/crimesider/entry6146939.shtml



January 27, 2010 1:00 PM

Tim Tebow Super Bowl Ad: CBS Willing to Consider More "Advocacy" Commercials After Abortion Flap

Posted by Ryan Smith

NEW YORK (CBS/AP) Florida Gators star Tim Tebow may have unwittingly stepped into the contentious legal and moral abortion debate, but the network that promises to air his controversial pro-life commercial during the Super Bowl seems to be jumping in with eyes wide open.

Despite criticism that the Tebow commercial, which is funded by Christian values group Focus on the Family, might send a message offensive to pro-choice advocates, CBS says they will run the spot during the Super Bowl, but will also consider other "responsibly produced" advocacy ads in its Feb. 7 broadcast. Presumably that means pro-choice advocates could purchase equal time.

The company said Tuesday it had received numerous e-mails, both critical and supportive, since a coalition of women's groups began a protest campaign against the ad.

The 30-second commercial is expected to recount the story of Pam Tebow's pregnancy in 1987. After getting sick during a mission trip to the Philippines, she ignored a recommendation by doctors to abort her fifth child.

She later gave birth to Tim, who won the 2007 Heisman Trophy and helped the Florida Gators win two BCS championships.

CBS said Tuesday that the decision to air the Tebow ad reflected a change in its policies toward advocacy spots that has evolved over the past several years.

"We have for some time moderated our approach to advocacy submissions after it became apparent that our stance did not reflect public sentiment or industry norms," said spokesman Dana McClintock. "In fact, most media outlets have accepted advocacy ads for some time."

In 2004, CBS was criticized by many liberal organizations for rejecting an ad by the United Church of Christ highlighting the UCC's welcoming stance toward gays and others who might feel shunned by more conservative churches.

CBS said Tuesday that, under its new policies, the UCC ad would have been accepted for airing.

Thirty-second commercials during the Super Bowl are selling for $2.5 million to $2.8 million.


I pray you will pray for Tebow and his family that God will give them guidance in this matter. Pray for the viewers of the Super Bowl that they will be open to the message in theTebow ad. Please pass this on. See article below.



Randy Stemock, M.S.


founder- PRA ( Protecting Rights of Americans)


American Family Association

Urge CBS to stand firm on airing pro-life Tebow Super Bowl ad


Send an e-mail to CBS Chairman Les Moonves today!

January 27, 2010

Dear Friend,

Our good friends at Focus on the Family have purchased time during this year's Super Bowl broadcast to air a compelling pro-life ad featuring Heisman Trophy winner Tim Tebow and the decision his mother made 23 years ago to give birth to her unborn son when doctors were urging her to abort him.

CBS has come under withering fire from the left for its decision to air this ad. Joy Behar of "The View" even said abortion would have been an appropriate choice since there was no way for Tim's mom to know that he wouldn't grow up to be a "rapist pedophile."

The hypocrisy here is thick. Abortion proponents claim to be all about choice, but they are outraged over an ad that features a woman exercising her right to choose life for her baby son.

Unfortunately, CBS sent a signal this week that it would be willing to accept "responsibly produced" ads that promote abortion or homosexuality. But a message that promotes death or sexual deviancy is not the moral equivalent of a message that celebrates life, and CBS must be urged to reject any such advocacy ads.

CBS needs to hear from all of us who support the decision to air the Tebow ad.

Take Action

E-mail CBS Chairman Les Moonves and CBS Entertainment President Nancy Tellem in support of their decision to air the Tebow Super Bowl ad. Please urge them to stand firm in the face of the angry voices of leftwing America.
 
It is very important that you forward this alert to your friends and family members.



Sincerely,

Tim Wildmon, President

American Family Association

Sunday, January 10, 2010

Harry Reid and a black perspective

The recent uproar in the media about Senator Harry Reid's (D) comments has produced comments and a backlash from many sources. The fact that Reid made comments about Obama's skin color is shocking only to those who don't see things as they really are.

First, the lie that Obama is the "first Afro-American president" must be set straight. If one mixes a white mother with a black father, you get milato, NOT black! Secondly, the fact that Obama's birth records have been sealed by the governor of Hawaii should have outraged all of America. This blatant cover-up of Obama's birth certificate is the largest scandal ever in America. This makes Watergate look like nothing. The recent lawsuits by several Americans to force Occidental College to release information about their former student Obama, has confirmed what many have claimed for over a year, Obama is NOT a "natural born " citizen of the U.S.!!!!!! The college has him listed as a foreign student who applied for foreign aid to attend school!

Now, getting back to the Reid comments. The fact that Reid made these comments reveals what most conservative thinkers have known, Obama is just a front for the predominantly white liberal agenda that will use anyone they need to to get control of the Congress, Senate and the White House. The fact that Obama was only a U.S. senator for about 186 days before announcing his candidacy for president should have shown how ridiculous his lack of qualifications were. But this didn't matter to liberals like Reid, Pelosi and others because as along as Obama or another liberal got into the White House, it put the Dems back in control of the nation. It didn't matter to Reid and other liberals that Obama was not qualified or a friend of Bill Ayers, a known domestic terrorist!!!!!!!!!!

The fact that Reid made these inappropriate comments about Obama is a sign of the underlying sentiment by many liberals about blacks. Many blacks who voted for Obama have now become aware thet Obama cannot fix all their problems and has now shown he doesn't have the ability to make the world right for the black community. In the U.S. many blacks have stated to me and to conservative radio and TV hosts that they wished they had not voted for Obama! Lt Col. Allen West, a respected black military leader, has stated the liberals have kept blacks in the ghetto mentality and have created the "new 21st century plantation" for blacks in America. Allen claims one only has to look at the Detroit inner-city to see the new plantation created by the liberals.

Even prominent blacks like Michael Steele, the head of the Republican National Convention, has spoken out about how the liberals have used the race card to charge conservatives with racial bias when comments are made about Obama or blacks in general. The race card is used by liberals when they feel threatened by the conservatives when they stand up against the abuses of the liberal agenda. The names that Pelosi, Reid and other top liberal politicians have used to describe Tea Party participants is another example of the labels used by liberals to counter the resistance of the conservatives. So, it should be no surprise that Reid has used inappropriate remarks about Obama except this time it is against a Democrat!!!!!!!!!!!

America, we need to wake up and see many liberals for what they are, lieing, manipulative and self-seeking people who do not have the well-being of ALL Americans in mind. As long as they get to keep their prized positions in politics and business, they don't care what happens to the rest of America!!!!!!! How do I know? The Obama administration is pushing a healthcare plan that will cost taxpayers an estimated $1.6 TRILLION dollars and recent polls show most Americans DO NOT want it!!!!!!!!!!!

I pray all who read this blog will open their eyes and see what the liberals are doing to our nation by pushing a self-serving agenda that will cost future generations their security and stability. We must vote all liberals and pseudo-conservatives out of office in 2010 and 2012 and take America back!!!!!!!!!!!!

Randy Stemock, M.S.